![]() |
|
Volume 27, Number 3, 2005 of the Journal of Real Estate Research
Abstract: Previous
studies of dual agency, where one agent serves both buyer and seller in
a transaction, use hedonic models. Repeat-sale methods can test for the
price effect of accepting dual agency. Dual agency does not show
convincing effects on expected gain, which would occur if there was a
systematic bias, or on heteroscedasticity, which would occur if there
are large effects that are rare. Earlier researchers could not test for
the effect of an owner picking a listing agent who was the earlier
selling agent. Consistently positive mean abnormal price gains come from
this choice, as well as significant heteroscedasticity.
|