| Russian Home Building in Transition
Author: Olga Z. Kaganova
Start Page: 65
End Page:76
Volume:7
Issue Number: 01
Year: 1999
Publication: Journal of Real Estate Literature
Abstract:
Since 1991, the reform governments of the Russian Federation and its
constituent republics have allowed and, in varying degrees, encouraged the
privatization of state-owned housing and new residential construction by
private firms for private ownership. This study describes the emergence of
private home-building enterprises engaged in two types of projects: (1)
The completion and sale of multifamily dwellings started during the
socialist regime and (2) development and marketing of single-family luxury
housing on land at the urban fringe. It is based on surveys of private
housing developers and secondary housing markets in seven cities of the
Russian Federation, including Moscow and St. Petersburg. The surveys were
conducted by Russian consultants in 1993 under the sponsorship of the U.S.
Agency for International Development and the World Bank. At the time of
the surveys, not all aspects of real estate development were yet conducted
under private institutions. The developers’ most important functions were
arranging project financing from private sources (own funds, homebuyers’
prepayments, back loans) and marketing the dwellings, usually prior to
completion. Municipal governments still controlled land allocations for
new housing. Municipal enterprises were also responsible for providing
access of the total development costs. In Moscow and St. Petersburg, a
substantial fraction of the completed dwellings were contractually
assigned to the municipality for disposition and, in all places studied,
additional units were sold to the developers’ employees, suppliers, and
city officials at a discount. Conditions that are necessary for further
development of market-based home-building include (1) development of more
market-oriented land policies by municipalities, (2) development of more
rational and feasible fees charged to developers by cities, (3)
modernization of utilities in cities, and (4) increasing developers’
understanding of importance of market studies.

|